Nuclear Satellite Inspections, New Horizons Awakens, and a Cosmic Catalog of Galaxy Clusters
In this episode
Astronomy Daily S05E136 — Thursday, 9 July 2026 An MIT physicist proposes a shoebox-sized satellite that could catch a hidden nuclear weapon in orbit, NASA's New Horizons wakes up after its longest hibernation ever nearly six billion miles from home, an Antarctic telescope catalogues over seven thousand galaxy clusters, Japan's ispace books cargo space on a SpaceX Starship Moon mission, a Falcon 9 booster breaks its own reuse record for a thirty-sixth flight, and we close with tonight's Venus–Regulus conjunction. In This Episode • A shoebox-sized satellite that could catch a hidden nuclear weapon in orbit • New Horizons wakes up after its longest hibernation, 5.9 billion miles from Earth • An Antarctic telescope catalogues over 7,000 galaxy clusters • Japan's ispace books cargo space on a SpaceX Starship Moon mission • SpaceX's Falcon 9 booster B1067 breaks its own reuse record — 36 flights • Tonight's sky: Venus cosies up to RegulusBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-the-latest-space-news--5648921/support.
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They beleive in privacy and there are no ads in their business model...yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get out special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail
Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here
This episode includes AI-generated content.
Anna: Hello and welcome to Astronomy
Daily. I'm Anna.
Avery: And I'm avery. It's Thursday, July
9, 2026, and we've got a proper
mixed bag for you today.
Anna: We've got nuclear physics hibernating
spacecraft, a map of thousands of
galaxy clusters, a moon delivery deal,
a rocket breaking its own record, and
we'll finish up looking at the evening sky.
Avery: Six stories, 16 minutes. Let's get into
it, Avery.
Anna: This first one sounds like the plot of a
thriller novel, but it's a real peer reviewed
paper that came out this week.
Avery: It really does. So here's the setup.
The 1967 Outer Space Treaty
bans nuclear weapons in orbit.
118 countries have signed it, including the
US and Russia. Problem is, there's never been
an actual way to check whether a satellite is
quietly breaking that rule.
Anna: Which matters a lot more than it might have a
few years ago, because back in February
2022, Russia launched a
satellite called Kosmos
2553 into a very
strange, very high radiation orbit.
Weeks later, they invaded Ukraine.
Avery: Russia says it's just a sensing and
surveillance satellite. U.S. officials have
suspected for a while that it might actually
be testing components for a nuclear anti
satellite weapon.
Anna: So how do you check without just taking
someone's word for it?
Avery: That's exactly the problem MIT physicist
Arag denagulian set out to solve, publishing
his solution in nature on July 8th.
His idea is a shoebox sized inspector
satellite, a nine unit cubesat that
flies up close to a suspect satellite.
Anna: And it's not looking for the bomb directly,
is it? It's looking for a signature,
right?
Avery: Neutrons. Earth's Van Allen radiation
belts are full of high energy protons.
And if there's a nuclear device up there,
those protons interacting with it produce a
very specific neutron signal. Dana
Gulian's modeling shows a single CubeSat
could confirm a nuclear warhead from about
4km away in roughly a week of
watching a constellation of 10 of them would
do it much faster.
Anna: Why does this even matter? Beyond the treaty
paperwork, what actually happens if someone
detonates a nuclear weapon in orbit?
Avery: This has actually been tried, believe it or
not. Back in 1962, the US ran
a test called Starfish Prime, a, ah,
1.4 megaton warhead detonated
in orbit. It pumped so many high energy
electrons into the Van Allen radiation belts
that it knocked out several satellites of
that era just, just from the radiation
environment it created.
Anna: So a modern version of that wouldn't just
take out one target, it could wipe out huge
swaths of orbit Reconnaissance
satellites, communications, gps,
starlink, all of it
indiscriminately.
Avery: Yes, which is exactly why Denaghulian is
up front that this isn't a uh, finished,
ready to launch system yet. His quote was
quote, this isn't a completely proven system.
The purpose of the paper is to show the
scientific community that it's scientifically
possible to do this.
Anna: I really like his line about why physics
based verification matters, especially
between countries that don't trust each other
very much.
Avery: You can fake intelligence, but you can't fake
physics. And that's really the heart of it. A
shoebox satellite that just measures
neutrons, doesn't care about geopolitics,
it just tells you what's actually there.
Anna: A genuinely elegant idea for a
genuinely unsettling problem.
Avery: From the very human problem of nuclear
weapons to a much older, much
quieter kind of drama.
NASA's New Horizons spacecraft just woke up.
Anna: It's been asleep for a while, hasn't it?
Avery: Its longest hyper mission yet.
321 days starting back on
August 7th last year. NASA confirmed on
July 7th that it's safely woken up in good
health.
Anna: And just to put the distance in perspective,
where actually is New Horizons right now?
Avery: 5.9 billion miles from Earth.
9.5 billion kilometers. That's so
far out that a radio signal traveling at the
literal speed of light takes 8 hours and
52 minutes just to get here one way.
Anna: So mission control says good morning and
doesn't hear back until almost lunchtime.
Avery: Pretty much. Mission operations manager Alice
Bowman said every single weekly status
beacon through the entire hibernation came
back green. Everything nominal the whole
time.
Anna: What's actually asleep during hibernation
though? Because it wasn't doing nothing out
there,
Avery: Most systems powered down to save energy. But
the science instruments kept working the
entire time. The solar wind around
Pluto or swap. The Pluto
Energetic Particle Spectrometer and
and the Venetia Burney student dust counter.
All quietly gathering ADA the whole way
through.
Anna: So now it's awake. What happens?
Avery: First, health and safety data comes down
first. Then the team starts retrieving nearly
a year's worth of stored science data. In
about three weeks, the onboard Alice
ultraviolet spectrograph will start studying
hydrogen gas out in the heliosphere while
swap Pepsi and the dust counter keep
measuring as engineers run instrument
checkouts.
Anna: This spacecraft's had quite a Life already.
Avery: Launched January 26,
2006. Fastest human made object
ever launched at the time. Blue pass, Pluto
in 2015 gave us our first close look at
the Kuiper Belt object arrokoth in
2019. And now it's pressing on toward
the true edge of the solar system's
heliosphere.
Anna: And it's running on updated Autonomy software
now too, to cope with the growing distance.
Avery: Exactly accounting for the slow decline in
power from its plutonium generator and the
ever lengthening delay in talking to Earth,
NASA HM expects it to keep returning good
data well into the2030s.
Anna: Nine hours for a single good morning
message. That's the kind of patience this
mission runs on.
Alright, moving on. This next one's been
making the rounds this week and it's a
genuinely enormous data set. A new
catalog of more than 7,000 galaxy
clusters built from five years of
Avery: data from the South Pole telescope,
specifically its SPT3G
camera out at the Amundsen uh, Scott South
Pole Station in Antarctica. An Argonne
National Laboratory led team put it together.
Anna: How much is the sky are we actually talking
about here?
Avery: About 4%, 1600
square degrees out. Out of that patch they
identified 8892
candidate clusters and confirmed
7190 of them.
Around 1800 of those date back more than
7.8 billion years.
Anna: How do you even spot a galaxy cluster? From a
telescope in Antarctica pointed at the sky?
Rather than say an optical telescope looking
at galaxies directly, they used something
called
Avery: the Sunyaev Zel Dutch effect. Light from
the cosmic microwave background. The
afterglow of the Big Bang passes through a
galaxy cluster on its way to us. And high
energy particles in the cluster subtly
distort that light. It leaves behind a faint
shadow like signature that the telescope can
pick up.
Anna: And then they double checked those detections
with something else.
Avery: Optical confirmation came from the Dark
Energy Survey. And here's the bit that
surprised even the researchers. The data
showed a marked increase in dust related
emission from these cluster environments.
Further back in time, that's a new window
into how star formation activity evolved in
and around these massive structures.
Anna: Why do galaxy clusters matter so much to
cosmologists?
Avery: Specifically, they're the largest
gravitationally bound structures in the
universe. Hundreds to thousands of
galaxies held together with hot gas and
huge amounts of dark matter. Because of
that scale, they're one of the best tools we
have for testing ideas about dark matter and
dark energy.
Anna: Sebastian Bouquet from the SPT
collaboration put it nicely, didn't he?
Avery: He did. Quote with the
SPT3G cluster sample we will
probe the evolution of cosmic structure
formation over the past 10 billion years.
And this is really just a start. Future work
will refine the cluster mass measurements and
upcoming surveys from the Vera Rubin
Observatory and Europe's Euclid Miss should
confirm M even more distant clusters in the
same patch of Sky.
Anna: Nearly 9,000 candidate structures,
each one holding thousands of galaxies.
And that's only 4% of the sky.
Avery: From cosmology back down to Earth. Well,
down to the moon, really. And the business of
getting there.
Anna: This is the Ispace and Starship story.
Avery: That's the one. Tokyo based lunar transport
company ispace announced on July 8 that
it's bought 500 kilograms, around
1100 pounds of cargo space
aboard a future starship mission targeting a
moon landing no earlier than 2030.
Anna: What did that actually cost them?
Avery: Um, around US$50
million, which works out to roughly
$100,000 per kilogram to the lunar
surface.
Anna: That's ispace's new business, isn't it?
Not just landing their own stuff, but
carrying other people's payloads too.
Avery: Exactly right. They're calling it their Lunar
Access Integrator Service. Think of it as a
shared ride bus to the moon. They'll
aggregate smaller payloads from governments,
research institutions and commercial
customers, which is a different business, to
their existing dedicated lander service,
which they describe as a more of a taxi.
Anna: And once Starship actually lands, how
does the cargo get to where it needs to go?
Avery: That's where ispace's own mobile cargo system
comes in. A rover they're developing that can
carry payloads a few kilometers from the
landing site to their final destination.
Anna: CEO Takeshi Hakamada had a good line about
why this matters.
Avery: For the bigger picture, Quote, high
capacity, relatively low cost lunar
transport, such as that provided by Starship,
is essential for realizing a sustainable
lunar economy that Ispace aims to create.
Anna: Now, I have to ask, ispace's track record
on actual landings hasn't been perfect.
Avery: No, it hasn't. They flown two lunar lander
missions on SpaceX Falcon 9 rockets in
2023 and 2025, and
both reached lunar orbit successfully, but
crashed during landing. They're now
developing a, uh, new lander design called
ultra, with three missions planned between
2028 and 2030, including
one under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload
Service program.
Anna: So rather than betting everything on getting
their own landings right, they're also
building a second business on somebody else's
rocket.
Avery: Precisely. And SpaceX seems keen on it too.
Their VP of Commercial Sales, Stephanie
Bednarig, said this gives, quote, a VALU
pathway for smaller payloads to secure a ride
to the moon today. Worth milling. This isn't
exclusive either. NASA's using Starship for
the crewed Artemis lander and the US company
AstroLabe has separately booked starship
cargo space as well.
Anna: Two failed landings hasn't slowed them down
one bit. If anything, they're doubling down
on the moon, just letting someone else do the
heavy lifting this time. Right, quick one
now, but a satisfying one if you like your
rockets to keep proving a point.
Avery: SpaceX launched the Falcon 9 out of Cape
Canaveral early this morning, July 9,
5:25am M Eastern Time, carrying
29 Starlink satellites.
Anna: And the headline isn't really the satellites,
Avery: no, it's the booster tail number.
B1067 flew for the
36th time today, breaking its own company
record, which was 35 flights.
Anna: For comparison, where does that sit against
the all time record for any reusable orbital
vehicle?
Avery: Still behind NASA's space shuttle Discovery,
which flew 39 times across its career.
But B1067 is closing the gap,
and it's doing it on a much faster turnaround
cadence than Discovery ever could.
Anna: What happened to the booster after
separation?
Avery: About eight and a half minutes after liftoff,
it landed on the drone ship, a shortfall of
gravitas out in the Atlantic. The upper
stage carried on and deployed those 29
Starlink satellites to low Earth orbit around
63 and a half minutes after launch.
Anna: This is launch number 80 for Falcon 9 this
year already, isn't it?
Avery: It is, and SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell
has said they're targeting somewhere around
140 to 145
Falcon 9 launches this year. SpaceX now
has more than 10,700 active
Starlink satellites in orbit. About 80%
of this year's flights have gone toward
building that constellation out.
Anna: 36 trips to space and back for the exact
same piece of hardware. Reusable rockets have
gone from a wild idea a decade ago to a
company quietly breaking its own record on an
ordinary Thursday morning.
Avery: And to close things out, something that
doesn't need a spacecraft, a, uh, peer
reviewed paper or a rocket. Just clear
skies and about 10 minutes after sunset.
Anna: This is tonight's sky, isn't it, July 9th?
Avery: That's right. Venus is putting on a lovely
little show, sitting close to Regulus, the
brightest star in the constellation Leo, low
in the evening sky after sunset.
Anna: And Venus is easy to find regardless because
it's so bright.
Avery: It's the brightest point of light in the sky
after the Moon. So this pairing is genuinely
a, uh, naked eye, no equipment needed kind of
moment. Look west after sunset and you can't
really miss it.
Anna: So of course, Venus and Regulus aren't
actually anywhere near each other in real
terms, not remotely.
Avery: Regulus is a proper star about 79
light years away. Venus is right here in our
own solar system. It's purely a trick of
perspective. From where we're standing, they
line up and look like neighbors.
Anna: And there's more to come this month, too.
Avery: There is. Venus goes on to meet a slender
crescent moon on July 17. So if you
enjoy this one, pencil that date in as well.
Anna: And for our listeners south of the
Avery: equator, Venus and Leo are still catchable
low in the western sky after sunset. For
Southern Hemisphere viewers, too. Well worth
a look if you want an easy win with the
family. No telescope required.
Anna: Sometimes the best story of the day really is
just look up right there. Tonight.
Avery: That's today's edition of Astronomy Daily.
Nuclear physics A Ah, spacecraft waking up
nine hours from home, thousands of galaxy
clusters, a moon delivery deal, a record
breaking rocket, and a couple of bright dots
in tonight's sky.
Anna: If you enjoyed today's episode, please hit
subscribe wherever you're listening and leave
us a review. It genuinely helps new listeners
find the show.
Avery: Show and here's today's did you know for you,
New Horizons radio signal takes almost
nine hours to reach Earth, which means by the
time mission control hears all systems green,
the spacecraft has already been fine for the
better part of a working day.
Anna: I'm Anna.
Avery: And I'm Avery. We'll see you next time on
Astronomy Daily.
Anna: Love.
Podbean