Moon Safe! Asteroid Threat Ends + Cosmic Laser Record + Solar Storm Hits Mars
In this episode
Astronomy Daily — S05E55 | 6 March 2026 Six stories today covering planetary defence, a cosmic laser record, a solar superstorm on Mars, space debris pollution, a mystery satellite launch, and the most charming farming experiment you'll hear about all year. Stories This Episode 1. Asteroid 2024 YR4 — Moon Impact Officially Ruled Out NASA has confirmed, using the James Webb Space Telescope, that infamous asteroid 2024 YR4 will not hit the Moon in 2032. The space rock — once the most dangerous asteroid identified in two decades — will instead pass the Moon at a distance of around 13,200 miles. It previously held a 4% lunar impact probability, now fully eliminated thanks to Webb's extraordinary sensitivity pushing it to the limits of what the telescope can observe. 2. MeerKAT Detects Cosmic 'Gigalaser' 8 Billion Light-Years Away South Africa's MeerKAT radio telescope has spotted the most distant hydroxyl megamaser ever detected — a natural 'space laser' in a galaxy undergoing a violent collision more than 8 billion light-years away. The signal is so powerful it qualifies as a gigamaser. Adding to the serendipity, the signal was further amplified by a foreground galaxy acting as a gravitational lens on its 8-billion-year journey to Earth. The discovery points toward the future capability of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). 3. ESA's Mars Orbiters Record Solar Superstorm Hitting Mars A new Nature Communications study reveals what happened when the record-breaking May 2024 solar superstorm hit Mars. ESA's Mars Express and ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter recorded unprecedented electron density spikes in the Martian upper atmosphere — up to 278% above normal — and both spacecraft experienced computer glitches from the energetic particles. The study uses a novel spacecraft-to-spacecraft radio occultation technique and highlights how Mars's lack of a global magnetic field leaves it vulnerable to solar events in ways that Earth is not. 4. SpaceX Falcon 9 Re-entry Directly Linked to Atmospheric Lithium Plume For the first time, scientists have directly tied a specific rocket re-entry to a measurable atmospheric pollution event. Researchers at the Leibniz Institute for Atmospheric Physics detected a tenfold spike in lithium vapour in the upper atmosphere — from 3 to 31 atoms per cubic centimetre — in the hours following the uncontrolled re-entry of a Falcon 9 upper stage off Ireland in February 2025. Eight thousand backward atmospheric simulations confirmed the connection. Published in Communications Earth & Environment, the paper raises important questions about the growing chemical footprint of the commercial space industry. 5. Rocket Lab Launches Mystery Satellite — 'Insight at Speed is a Friend Indeed' Rocket Lab completed its 83rd Electron launch from New Zealand, deploying a single satellite for a confidential commercial customer to an orbit 470 km above Earth. The company announced the mission just hours before liftoff, offering no further details on the customer or the payload's purpose. 6. Scientists Grow Chickpeas in Simulated Moon Dirt for First Time Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M University have successfully grown and harvested chickpeas in simulated lunar regolith — the first time this has ever been achieved. Using a combination of vermicompost (worm castings) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to condition the otherwise toxic, sterile moon dirt, the team produced flowering, seed-bearing plants in soil mixtures of up to 75% regolith simulant. The chickpeas have not yet been cleared for eating pending metal accumulation testing — but the team's goal of 'moon hummus' is, apparently, very much alive. Find Us: astronomydaily.io | @AstroDailyPod on all platforms Subscribe & Review: Apple Podcasts · Spotify · YouTube · everywhere you listenBecome a supporter of this podcast: <a...
Speaker 1: Hey, everyone, Welcome back to Astronomy Daily.
Speaker 2: I'm Ana and I'm Avery. Happy Friday, space fans, We've
Speaker 2: got a great one for you today.
Speaker 1: We do six stories, and honestly, this is one of
Speaker 1: the more varied lineups we've had in a while. We've
Speaker 1: got planetary defense, a cosmic laser from halfway across the universe,
Speaker 1: a solar superstorm hitting Mars, a SpaceX rocket polluting the
Speaker 1: atmosphere on its way.
Speaker 2: Down, a mystery satellite launch from the other side of
Speaker 2: the world, and my personal favorite scientists trying to grow
Speaker 2: chickpeas on the moon.
Speaker 1: Bon hummus. Avery, that's where we're headed.
Speaker 2: Moon hummus. Let's go.
Speaker 1: Okay, First up, great news for anyone who's been losing
Speaker 1: sleep over asteroid twenty twenty four y R four. NASA
Speaker 1: has now officially ruled out any chance of it hitting
Speaker 1: the Moon in twenty thirty two.
Speaker 2: Right, So let's quickly recap the story for anyone who
Speaker 2: hasn't been following it. This asteroid was discovered back in
Speaker 2: December twenty twenty four, and for a while it was
Speaker 2: genuinely alarming. It briefly became the most dangerous asteroid identified
Speaker 2: in the last twenty years with a small but very
Speaker 2: real chance it could hit Earth.
Speaker 1: That Earth impact risk was ruled out fairly quickly, but
Speaker 1: when the asteroid faded from view last year, astronomers were
Speaker 1: left with something almost as intriguing, a lingering four percent
Speaker 1: chance it could strike the Moon on December twenty second,
Speaker 1: twenty thirty two.
Speaker 2: Four percent sounds small, but in asteroid terms, that's enormous.
Speaker 2: We're talking about a sixty meter rock, roughly the same
Speaker 2: size as what caused the Tenguska event in nineteen oh eight,
Speaker 2: or what dugout meteor crater in Arizona. If it hit
Speaker 2: the near side of the Moon, it would have created
Speaker 2: a crater about a kilometer wide and put on the
Speaker 2: most spectacular light show humanity has ever seen from Earth.
Speaker 1: So everyone's been watching very closely. The problem was by
Speaker 1: spring last year, the asteroid had drifted so far away
Speaker 1: it was invisible to pretty much every telescope on Earth
Speaker 1: and in space, with one exception.
Speaker 2: The James Web Space Telescope, which pushed itself to its
Speaker 2: very limits To catch this thing. A team led by
Speaker 2: the JOHNS. Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory used Web's near infrared
Speaker 2: camera in two observation windows in February the eighteenth and
Speaker 2: the twenty six to track down this incredibly faint speck
Speaker 2: against the background of stars.
Speaker 1: And the result was clear. The new measurements allowed scientists
Speaker 1: to map twenty twenty four y are forest trajectory with
Speaker 1: enough precision to rule out a lunar collision. Instead of
Speaker 1: hitting the Moon, It's going to pass at a distance
Speaker 1: of about thirteen thousand, two hundred miles from the lunar surface,
Speaker 1: which is yes, closer than some satellites orbit Earth, but
Speaker 1: it's a miss.
Speaker 2: Thirteen thousand, two hundred miles is basically next door in
Speaker 2: astronomical terms, but next door is still a miss. The
Speaker 2: Moon is safe, Earth is safe, and twenty twenty four
Speaker 2: yr four is just gonna keep trucking.
Speaker 1: NASA says they'll observe it again when it swings back
Speaker 1: near Earth in twenty twenty eight, So the story isn't
Speaker 1: quite over, but for now the threat is officially off
Speaker 1: the table.
Speaker 2: Good news to kick off the show What's next?
Speaker 1: Okay? Story two. This one comes out of South Africa
Speaker 1: and it involves what scientists are describing as a cosmic laser.
Speaker 1: And I mean that almost literally.
Speaker 2: Tell me more lasers in space. Sounds like something I
Speaker 2: need in my life.
Speaker 1: So astronomers using the Meerkat radio telescope in the Karu
Speaker 1: Desert have detected the most distant hydroxyl megamazer ever found.
Speaker 1: It's located in a violently merging galaxy four than eight
Speaker 1: billion light years away, and the signal is so powerful
Speaker 1: that researchers are actually calling it a gigamaser rather than
Speaker 1: a megamser.
Speaker 2: Okay, let's break this down for people. What exactly is
Speaker 2: a hydroxyl megamser?
Speaker 1: Right, So, on Earth, a laser works by exciting atoms
Speaker 1: or molecules until they release light in a very tight
Speaker 1: amplified beam. The same basic physics can happen in space,
Speaker 1: but instead of visible light, it happens at radio wavelengths.
Speaker 1: Hydroxyl molecules that's one hydrogen, one oxygen in massive gas
Speaker 1: clouds can be excited by the energy of colliding galaxies
Speaker 1: and amplify radio waves in exactly the same way. When
Speaker 1: the signal is extraordinarily bright, it's called a megamaser.
Speaker 2: So it's a natural radio laser powered by two galaxies
Speaker 2: smashing into each other.
Speaker 1: Exactly, and the one mirror caatound cataloged as hat Las
Speaker 1: J one four two nine three five point three dash
Speaker 1: zero zero two eight three six is the most distant
Speaker 1: and luminous example ever detected. We're seeing it as it
Speaker 1: existed when the universe was less than half its current age.
Speaker 2: And you said there was a gravitational lens involved as well.
Speaker 1: Yes, this is the really lovely part of the story.
Speaker 1: On its eight billion year journey to Earth, the radio
Speaker 1: signal happened to pass directly behind another completely unrelated galaxy
Speaker 1: sitting between us and the source. That foreground galaxy's gravity
Speaker 1: bent and warped space around it, acting like a natural
Speaker 1: magnifying glass and amplifying the signal even further before it
Speaker 1: reached Meerkat. So we have a natural space laser being
Speaker 1: focused by a natural gravitational telescope.
Speaker 2: That is genuinely delightful. The universe just handed astronomers a
Speaker 2: cosmic gift.
Speaker 1: The lead researcher, doctor Thoto Monomela, from the University of Pretoria,
Speaker 1: described it beautifully. He said they were seeing the radio
Speaker 1: equivalent of a laser halfway across the universe, and that
Speaker 1: it was a wonderfully serendipitous discovery.
Speaker 2: And the bigger picture here is that Meerkat is a
Speaker 2: precursor to the square kilometer array, the SKA, which is
Speaker 2: going to be even more powerful. So this is just
Speaker 2: a start of what's possible exactly.
Speaker 1: Bonamella's team wants to find hundreds, even thousands of these objects,
Speaker 1: and when the SKA comes online, that's going to become
Speaker 1: a real possibility.
Speaker 2: Incredible, all right.
Speaker 1: Story three and a bit of recent space history.
Speaker 2: Story three takes us back to May twenty twenty four
Speaker 2: and to Mars. You might remember that in May twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four, Earth was hit by the biggest solar storm
Speaker 2: recorded in over twenty years. Spectacular auroras were seen as
Speaker 2: far south as Mexico.
Speaker 1: I remember it well. Half the world was posting aurora photos, right.
Speaker 2: But that same storm also slammed into Mars. And thanks
Speaker 2: to Issa's two Mars orbiters, Mars Express and Exo Mars
Speaker 2: Trace Gas Orbital, we now know in unprecedented detail what
Speaker 2: that actually looked like. A new paper published today in
Speaker 2: Nature Communications reveals a full picture.
Speaker 1: So what happened to Mars?
Speaker 2: In short, Mars got absolutely hammered. The storm sent fast moving,
Speaker 2: energetic magnetized plasma and X rays flooding towards the red planet.
Speaker 2: When this barrage hit Mars's upper atmosphere, it stripped electrons
Speaker 2: from neutral atoms, causing two distinct layers of the atmosphere
Speaker 2: to fill up with charged particles at altitudes of around
Speaker 2: one hundred and ten and one hundred and thirty kilometers.
Speaker 1: How much of an effect are we talking?
Speaker 2: The electron density in those layers surged by forty five
Speaker 2: percent in one and a whopping two hundred and seventy
Speaker 2: eight percent in the other. Lead author Jacob Parrott from
Speaker 2: ISSA described it as the biggest response to a solar
Speaker 2: storm ever seen at Mars.
Speaker 1: And the orbiters themselves were affected too.
Speaker 2: Write they were both spacecraft suffered computer errors from the
Speaker 2: energetic particles, which is a known hazard of space weather,
Speaker 2: But crucially both had been designed with radiation resistant components
Speaker 2: and error correction systems, so they recovered fast and the
Speaker 2: time was incredibly fortunate. The researchers were able to capture
Speaker 2: the aftermath of the storm using a technique called radio
Speaker 2: ocultation just ten minutes after a large solar flare hit Mars.
Speaker 1: Radial occultation for our listeners that's where one spacecraft beams
Speaker 1: a radio signal to another at precisely the moment it
Speaker 1: disappears over the planet's horizon. The signal gets bent by
Speaker 1: the atmosphere on the way, and scientists can read all
Speaker 1: sorts of information about the atmospheric layers from the way
Speaker 1: it bends.
Speaker 2: It's a technique that's been used for decades here at Earth,
Speaker 2: but only recently has it been applied between two spacecraft
Speaker 2: that Mars. This was a perfect demonstration of how powerful
Speaker 2: it can.
Speaker 1: Be, and there's a broader significance here, isn't there. Mars
Speaker 1: has no global magnetic field the way Earth does, which
Speaker 1: is why the storm hits so much harder.
Speaker 2: Exactly on Earth, our magnetic field deflects a lot of
Speaker 2: the solar particles and channels the rest toward the poles
Speaker 2: as auroras. Mars lost its magnetic field billions of years ago,
Speaker 2: and that's almost certainly why it also lost most of
Speaker 2: its atmosphere and its liquid water over time. This study
Speaker 2: helps us understand that ongoing process, and it has very
Speaker 2: practical implications for future crude missions and radar operations on
Speaker 2: and around Mars.
Speaker 1: Really fascinating staff.
Speaker 2: Okay story four, and this one has a bit more
Speaker 2: of an edge to it.
Speaker 1: So this story starts with a SpaceX Falcon nine upper
Speaker 1: stage that back in February twenty twenty five failed to
Speaker 1: execute its planned de orbit burn after delivering twenty two
Speaker 1: Starlink satellites to orbit. It drifted uncontrolled for eighteen days
Speaker 1: before beginning an uncontrolled re entry about one hundred kilometers
Speaker 1: off the west coast of Ireland.
Speaker 2: I remember this one. Some debris came down in Poland,
Speaker 2: which caused a fairly significant diplomatic incident. Poland dismissed its
Speaker 2: head of Space agency over the lack of communication about
Speaker 2: where the thing was going to land.
Speaker 1: Right. But now there's a new dimension to this story.
Speaker 1: A paper just published in Communications, Earth and Environment by
Speaker 1: Robin Wing and her colleagues at the Leibnitz Institute for
Speaker 1: Atmospheric Physics in Germany has for the first time ever
Speaker 1: directly tied a specific rocket re entry to a measurable
Speaker 1: atmospheric pollution plume.
Speaker 2: How did they do that?
Speaker 1: They were operating a highly sensitive resonance fluorescence led our
Speaker 1: system in Kulan's Born, Germany, essentially a laser based atmospheric
Speaker 1: monitoring instrument. They weren't specifically watching for the rocket, they
Speaker 1: were just doing their regular atmospheric observations. But right around
Speaker 1: midnight on the twentieth of February twenty twenty five, just
Speaker 1: twenty hours after the Falcon nine came down, they detected
Speaker 1: a spike in lithium vapor levels in the upper atmosphere.
Speaker 2: Lithium, which which is not something that should be up
Speaker 2: there in any quantity.
Speaker 1: Normally, lithium in the upper atmosphere sits at about three
Speaker 1: atoms per cubic centimeter. They measured a spike to thirty
Speaker 1: one atoms per cubic centimeter at an altitude of between
Speaker 1: ninety four and ninety seven kilometers. That's a tenfold increase.
Speaker 2: And lithium is in the rocket because.
Speaker 1: Falcon nine upper stages carry an estimated thirty kilograms of
Speaker 1: lithium in lithium ion batteries and in the aluminum lithium
Speaker 1: alloy that makes up the whole plating. Critically, that alloy
Speaker 1: starts melting at precisely ninety eight point two kilometers altitude,
Speaker 1: which matches exactly where the pollution cloud was detected.
Speaker 2: That's a pretty compelling fingerprint. But did they need to
Speaker 2: do more than just say, well, there's lithium up there
Speaker 2: and a rocket just fell down.
Speaker 1: They did. They ran eight thousand simulations of backward wind
Speaker 1: trajectories from the light our station in Germany all the
Speaker 1: way back to the re entry point over Ireland. They
Speaker 1: checked every other possible source and everything pointed to the rocket.
Speaker 1: The case is solid.
Speaker 2: So what are the implications. Is a lithium cloud in
Speaker 2: the upper atmosphere a big deal?
Speaker 1: That's actually still an open question, and the researchers are
Speaker 1: honest about that. We don't yet fully understand the impact
Speaker 1: on atmosphere chemistry. But what this paper represents is a first.
Speaker 1: It's the first time a specific re entry event has
Speaker 1: been directly linked to a specific pollution plume. And with
Speaker 1: the growth of mega constellations hundreds and eventually thousands of
Speaker 1: satellites being launched and diorbited, this is going to become
Speaker 1: an increasingly important area of study.
Speaker 2: And presumably we need to start thinking about whether controlled
Speaker 2: re entries can be designed to minimize this kind of
Speaker 2: chemical contamination exactly.
Speaker 1: That's the question the paper ends with. It's not alarmist,
Speaker 1: it's more of a we need to start measuring this
Speaker 1: properly moment, which this paper very much is good.
Speaker 2: Story five slightly.
Speaker 1: Lighter, it's mystery launch time.
Speaker 2: Okay, story five. Rocket Lab launched an electron rocket from
Speaker 2: its New Zealand site yesterday evening local time, marking the
Speaker 2: company's eighty third launch to date. The mission is called
Speaker 2: Insight at Speed is a friend, indeed, which is exactly
Speaker 2: the kinds of cryptic mission name that drives people absolutely
Speaker 2: mad on the space forums.
Speaker 1: What do we know about it?
Speaker 2: Almost nothing, which is rather the point. Rocket Lab announced
Speaker 2: to launch just a few hours before liftoff, which is
Speaker 2: unusually short notice even for them. They confirmed it's a
Speaker 2: single satellite for a confidential commercial customer, deployed to an
Speaker 2: orbit about four hundred and seventy kilometers above Earth. That's it.
Speaker 1: The mission name is interesting, though, Insight at Speed. That
Speaker 1: sounds like it could be an Earth observation or intelligence
Speaker 1: related payload fast access to imagery.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's been the general speculation. And yes, small fast
Speaker 2: satellite for rapid imaging. But rocket Lab isn't saying anything
Speaker 2: beyond confidential commercial customer, and the customer isn't saying anything either,
Speaker 2: which is of course they're right.
Speaker 1: Rocket Lab has carved out quite a niche for exactly
Speaker 1: this kind of mission. Small, dedicated launches on relatively short
Speaker 1: notice for customers who want discretion. It's a good business
Speaker 1: to be.
Speaker 2: In eighty three launches in counting. They're doing just fine. Okay,
Speaker 2: last story, and I've been looking forward to this one
Speaker 2: all morning.
Speaker 1: That can only mean one thing. It's a food related story.
Speaker 2: Right. Scientists at the University of Texas at Austin, working
Speaker 2: with Texas A and M, have successfully grown and harvested
Speaker 2: chickpeas in simulated moon dirt, published today in Scientific Reports.
Speaker 2: First time it's ever been done.
Speaker 1: Okay, tell me everything.
Speaker 2: So the challenge with lunar regolith, which is the technical
Speaker 2: name for moon dirt, is that it is spectacularly hostile
Speaker 2: to plant life. It's fine as t powder, it's subrasive
Speaker 2: and clingy, it has no organic material whatsoever, no microbes,
Speaker 2: and it contains toxic heavy metals like aluminum, copper, and zinc.
Speaker 2: Previous attempts to grow plants in actual Apollo lunar samples
Speaker 2: resulted in stressed, stunted plants that absorbed dangerous levels of metals.
Speaker 1: So how did the Texas team crack it?
Speaker 2: Two ingredients. First, vermic compost, which is essentially worm castings.
Speaker 2: Red wiggler earthworms were fed food scraps and cotton waste,
Speaker 2: the kind of organic material that would naturally accumulate on
Speaker 2: a long lunar mission anyway, and their output provided a rich,
Speaker 2: microbiley diverse soil amendment that could be mixed with the
Speaker 2: reguliff simulant. Okay, so wormpoo got it precisely. Second ingredient
Speaker 2: are buscular micorrhizal fungi AMF, which were used to coat
Speaker 2: the chickpea seeds before planting. These fungi are remarkable. They
Speaker 2: extend into the soil like the secondary root system, improving
Speaker 2: nutrient uptake while simultaneously helping to sequester heavy metals away
Speaker 2: from the plant. They also produce proteins that bind loose
Speaker 2: regulith particles together, making the stuff behave more like actual soil.
Speaker 1: And it worked.
Speaker 2: It worked with caveats mixtures of up to seventy five
Speaker 2: percent reguli, simulants could successfully produce flowering seed bearing plants.
Speaker 2: Go above seventy five percent, and the plants started showing
Speaker 2: serious stress and dying early and across the board. The
Speaker 2: regulith plants produce fewer seeds than the control plants grown
Speaker 2: in ordinary earth soil, though the individual seeds that did
Speaker 2: grow were comparable in size and weight.
Speaker 1: Can they eat them?
Speaker 2: Not yet. The chickpeas are currently being tested for metal accumulation.
Speaker 2: They need to make sure no dangerous levels of aluminum
Speaker 2: or other heavy metals made it into the seeds before
Speaker 2: anyone takes a bite. The lead researcher, Jessica Atkins said,
Speaker 2: and I love this. Before anyone makes moon hummus, we
Speaker 2: need to confirm they are safe and nutritious. She has
Speaker 2: also promised to be the first one to make Moon
Speaker 2: hummus if they pass.
Speaker 1: That is a fantastic quote. And I love that she
Speaker 1: played bad Moon rising. To encourage the plants in the lab, she.
Speaker 2: Hung a poster of chickpeas growing on the moon above
Speaker 2: the growth chamber as well. Kind of silly, but something
Speaker 2: to aim for. This is the energy we want in
Speaker 2: space science.
Speaker 1: So what's the bigger picture here? This isn't just about hummus?
Speaker 1: I assume no.
Speaker 2: Although the hummus angle is doing a lot of heavy
Speaker 2: lifting for the press coverage, the real significance is this.
Speaker 2: As we plan for long term human presence on the
Speaker 2: Moon through the Artemis program and beyond. Food sustainability is
Speaker 2: a genuine challenge. You cannot shuttle all the food you
Speaker 2: need from Earth to a lunar base, and definitely the
Speaker 2: cost is prohibitive. So being able to grow crops from
Speaker 2: local resources, converting sterile regolith into living soil using biology
Speaker 2: that future astronauts could actually bring with them and maintain,
Speaker 2: is a crucial piece of the.
Speaker 1: Puzzle, and chickpeas specifically are a great choice for this
Speaker 1: right high protein resilient plant.
Speaker 2: Exactly high protein nitrogen fixing, they actually put nutrients back
Speaker 2: into the soil as they grow and relatively hardy. The
Speaker 2: team is now exploring whether seeds from the moon grown
Speaker 2: chickpeas can grow a second generation and what the nutritional
Speaker 2: profile of the harvest looks like. It's early days, but
Speaker 2: Sarah Santos, the principal investigator, summed it up well, this
Speaker 2: is a small first step toward growing crops on the Moon,
Speaker 2: but we have shown this is feasible and we are
Speaker 2: moving in the right direction.
Speaker 1: Moon Hummus coming to a lunar outpost near you.
Speaker 2: Eventually I will be first in line and.
Speaker 1: That's your Astronomy Daily for Friday, the sixth of March
Speaker 1: twenty twenty six.
Speaker 2: I'm Anna and I'm Avery. Thanks so much for listening,
Speaker 2: Space fans. If you enjoyed today's show, please leave us
Speaker 2: a review. Wherever you get your podcasts, it genuinely makes
Speaker 2: a difference.
Speaker 1: You can find show notes, our blog, and a whole
Speaker 1: lot more at Astronomy Daily dot io, and we're at
Speaker 1: astro Daily pod on x, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and elsewhere.
Speaker 2: We'll be back tomorrow with more of the universe's greatest hits.
Speaker 2: Until then, keep looking up.
Speaker 1: Clear skies everyone.
Speaker 2: Sunny Day STARSTZ Starzo
Speaker 1: Star,
Podbean