Cosmic Discoveries; Callisto's Aurora Footprint and Record-Breaking Fast Radio Burst
In this episode
- Juno Mission's Discovery of Callisto's Auroral Footprint: NASA's Juno mission has successfully identified the elusive auroral footprint of Callisto, one of Jupiter's Galilean moons. This significant finding confirms that all four Galilean moons interact with Jupiter's magnetosphere, providing vital data on the energetic particles and magnetic fields involved in this interaction. The discovery was published in the journal Nature Communications on September 1, 2025.
- Record-Breaking Fast Radio Burst RB Float: An international team of astronomers has identified one of the brightest fast radio bursts (FRBs) ever observed, named RB Float. Traced to a galaxy 130 million light years away, this FRB emitted as much energy in a few milliseconds as the Sun produces in four days. This breakthrough marks a significant advancement in the study of FRBs, allowing scientists to pinpoint their origins with unprecedented accuracy.
- Murchison Wide Field Array Upgrade: The Murchison Wide Field Array in Australia has completed a major upgrade, doubling its antennas to 8,192. This enhancement boosts its capabilities in exploring fundamental questions in astronomy, including the epoch of reionization and the mysterious odd radio circles.
- NASA's Climate Satellites Under Threat: A political struggle looms as proposed budget cuts threaten two critical NASA satellites monitoring carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. Scientists warn that terminating these missions would undermine decades of research essential for understanding climate change and holding polluters accountable.
- For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, TikTok, and our new Instagram account! Don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- Thank you for tuning in. This is Steve and Hallie signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and exploring the wonders of our universe.
Juno Mission Discovery
[NASA](https://www.nasa.gov/)
Fast Radio Burst Research
[Astrophysical Journal Letters](https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/0004-637X)
Murchison Wide Field Array Upgrade
[MWA](https://www.mwa.gov.au/)
NASA Climate Satellites
[NASA](https://www.nasa.gov/)
Astronomy Daily
[Astronomy Daily](http://www.astronomydaily.io/)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support.
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.bitesz.com/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You'll be...
Speaker 1: Welcome back to Astronomy Daily. I'm your one hundred percent
Speaker 1: of human host Steve Dunkley. It's the eighth of September
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five podcast your whole speed. Yes, welcome back.
Speaker 1: It's Monday, and regular listeners will know what that means, right,
Speaker 1: how ae you?
Speaker 2: It's the mostly live episode of Astronomy Daily.
Speaker 1: Of course, Yes, that's right, mostly live, because I'm live
Speaker 1: and I'm ay i ai. Indeed, for those new to
Speaker 1: the Astronomy Daily.
Speaker 2: Universe, So what have you got for us today, my
Speaker 2: favorite human?
Speaker 1: Oh well, I'm glad you asked, Hally. First, up a
Speaker 1: couple of fresh stories from the Astronomy Daily newsletter, including
Speaker 1: a political battle, sorry about the politics to keep a
Speaker 1: couple of critical NASA satellites on mission, a story about
Speaker 1: record breaking super fast FRB.
Speaker 2: I love Farb's well.
Speaker 1: Of course you do. That's your story, by the way,
Speaker 1: Oh goodie, Really contain your enthusiasm, Halle.
Speaker 2: I'll try.
Speaker 1: Oh I'm sure you will go. And we also have
Speaker 1: exciting news from the Murchison Wild wide Field array. That's
Speaker 1: a bit of a tongue. Tis differ me and my
Speaker 1: little favorite space probe Juno all the way out near Jupiter.
Speaker 2: Go you good thing, Juno.
Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, that super little craft is working like clockwork,
Speaker 1: and we'll catch up with the latest from way out
Speaker 1: there very soon.
Speaker 2: Awesome. So shall we kick it off then?
Speaker 1: Why don't we? I'm ready when you are, helly, here
Speaker 1: we go, ohkies.
Speaker 2: Jupiter is well known for the massive aurory that occur
Speaker 2: near the planet's polar regions, the brightest and most powerful
Speaker 2: in the Solar System. Much like Aurora here on Earth,
Speaker 2: these shimmering lights are the result of interaction between the
Speaker 2: planet's magnetic field and solar wind. Unlike Earth's, though Jupiter's
Speaker 2: largest mood uns Io Europa and Ganymede, also known as
Speaker 2: the Galileans, leave their own auroral signatures in the planet's atmosphere.
Speaker 2: These induced arori are known as satellite footprints and track
Speaker 2: how each moon interacts with Jupiter and the local space environment.
Speaker 2: Whereas scientists have observed how Io Europa and Ganymede create
Speaker 2: satellite footprints in Jupiter's atmosphere, Callisto has remained a bit
Speaker 2: of an outlier despite multiple attempts using the Hubble Space
Speaker 2: Telescope HST. Signatures caused by Callisto remained elusive. Thanks to
Speaker 2: NASA's Juno mission, which achieved orbit around Jupiter in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 2: Callisto's satellite footprint has finally been found. In a recent study,
Speaker 2: an international team of scientists presented evidence of these polar
Speaker 2: light signatures in Jupiter's atmosphere for the first time. While
Speaker 2: JUNO has provided close up views of Jupiter's aroy, capturing
Speaker 2: Callisto's foot print presented a major challenge. In addition to
Speaker 2: being faint, Callisto's auroral signature typically resides above the brighter
Speaker 2: region where Jupiter's aroory are displayed the main auroral oval.
Speaker 2: To measure Callisto's footprint, the science team needed to image
Speaker 2: Jupiter's polar region only after the main auroral oval moved aside.
Speaker 2: The spacecraft also needed to cross the magnetic field line
Speaker 2: linking Calisto and Jupiter for its instruments to detect the
Speaker 2: auroral signature. This included its magnetometer, Jovian auroral distributions experiment,
Speaker 2: and Jovian Energetic particle Detector instrument. As luck would have it,
Speaker 2: both of these events occurred in September twenty nineteen, when
Speaker 2: a massive high density solar stream hit Jupiter's magnetosphere, causing
Speaker 2: it to shift to lower latitudes. This is similar to
Speaker 2: how solar storms often pushed the Northern lights to more
Speaker 2: southern latitudes. This revealed Callisto's auroral footprint and provided vital
Speaker 2: data on the energetic particles, electromagnetic waves, and magnetic fields
Speaker 2: associated with the interaction. This confirms that all four Galilean
Speaker 2: moons leave lasting indications of their passage through Jupiter's magnetic field.
Speaker 2: The paper on the discovery in situ and remote observations
Speaker 2: of the ultraviolet footprint of the Moon Callisto by the
Speaker 2: Juno spacecraft was published in the journal Nature Communications on
Speaker 2: September first, twenty twenty five. You're listening to Astronomy Daily
Speaker 2: podcast Christine Dunkle.
Speaker 1: Oh, Helly, I know I promised you this story, but
Speaker 1: I think I'm going to do it myself.
Speaker 2: That's okay, my favorite human.
Speaker 1: Well, thanks, Helly.
Speaker 2: I don't mind if you take the best most interesting
Speaker 2: stories for yourself. Oh yeah, that's okay. I'll just go
Speaker 2: and do some archiving in the back surf or something.
Speaker 3: Why don't I Okay, just don't make too much noise, Okay. Hey,
Speaker 3: A team of astronomers spotted i BE Float, one of
Speaker 3: the brightest fast radio bursts ever seen, and traced it
Speaker 3: to a galaxy one hundred and thirty million like years away.
Speaker 3: An international group of researchers, including astrophysicists from Northwestern University,
Speaker 3: has identified one of the brightest fast radio bursts or
Speaker 3: FRBs ever seen and determined its origin with a level
Speaker 3: of accuracy never achieved before. The flash lasted only a
Speaker 3: fraction of a second and has been given a nickname
Speaker 3: rb float, short for Radio Brightest Flash of All Time
Speaker 3: and yes a nod to root beer float. It was
Speaker 3: detected by Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment or CHIME, together
Speaker 3: with its newly completed OUTRIGG array. By coordinating measurements from
Speaker 3: stations in British Columbia, West Virginia, and California, the team
Speaker 3: traced the burst to a specific spiral arm of a
Speaker 3: galaxy located one hundred and thirty million like years away,
Speaker 3: with an astonishing precision of.
Speaker 1: Just forty two light years. FRBs are notoriously difficult to
Speaker 1: study because they disappear almost instantly and occur at immense distances.
Speaker 1: When astronomers are able to pin down the exact location
Speaker 1: of one, they can examine its surroundings in detail, learning
Speaker 1: about the host galaxy, its distance from Earth, and possible
Speaker 1: causes of the burst. Over time, these insights may help
Speaker 1: scientists uncover the true origins of these brief but powerful outbursts.
Speaker 1: Details of the discovery were published on August twenty one
Speaker 1: in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. This marks the first time
Speaker 1: the fully operational outrigger array has been used to determine
Speaker 1: the position of an FRB. It's remarkable that only a
Speaker 1: couple of months after the full outrigger array went online,
Speaker 1: they discovered an extremely bright FRB in the galaxy in
Speaker 1: our own cosmic neighborhood. An increase in the event rates
Speaker 1: always provide the opportunity for discovering more rare events. The
Speaker 1: Chime FRB CAR collaboration worked for many years toward this
Speaker 1: a technical achievement, and the team was rewarded with this event.
Speaker 1: The result marks a turning point, said corresponding author Amanda Cook,
Speaker 1: a postdoctoral researcher with McGill University. Instead of just detecting
Speaker 1: these mysterious flashes, we can now see exactly where they
Speaker 1: are coming from. It opens a door to discovering whether
Speaker 1: they are caused by dying stars, exotic magnetic objects, or
Speaker 1: something we haven't even thought of yet. When Fivefong, a
Speaker 1: senior author on the study who specializes in studying cosmic explosions,
Speaker 1: is an associate professor of physics and astronomy at Northwestern's
Speaker 1: Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. She's also part of
Speaker 1: the Center of Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics and
Speaker 1: the NSF Simmons Ai Institute for Sky Flaring Up in
Speaker 1: Disappearing within milliseconds FRBs are brief and powerful radio blasts
Speaker 1: that generate more energy in one quicker burst than our
Speaker 1: sun emits an entire year. While most past unnoticed every
Speaker 1: once in a while, and FRB is bright enough to
Speaker 1: detect FRB twenty twenty five zero three one six a
Speaker 1: or refloat RB float, was one of these rare events.
Speaker 1: Detected in March twenty twenty five. RB float released as
Speaker 1: much energy energy in a few milliseconds as the sun
Speaker 1: producers in four days. It was so bright that our
Speaker 1: pipeline initially flagged it as radio frequency interference signals often
Speaker 1: caused by cell phones or aeroplanes that are much closer
Speaker 1: to home, said Fong. It took some slewthing by members
Speaker 1: of our collaboration to uncover that it was real astrophysical signal.
Speaker 1: And while many FRBs repeat pulsing multiple times across several months,
Speaker 1: RB float emitted all its energy in just one burst.
Speaker 1: Even in the hundreds of hours after it was first observed,
Speaker 1: astronomers did not detect repeat bursts from the source. That
Speaker 1: means astrophysicists couldn't wait for another flare to gather more data. Instead,
Speaker 1: they had only one shot at pinpointing its location. RB
Speaker 1: float was the first non repeating source localized to such precisions,
Speaker 1: said Northwestern's Sunil Simma, a postdoctoral scholar at Sierra and
Speaker 1: study co author. Thus, even detecting rb float is proof
Speaker 1: of concept that chime is indeed capable of detecting such
Speaker 1: events and building a statistically interesting sample of FRBs. To
Speaker 1: investigate RB float's origin, the scientists relied on Chime, a
Speaker 1: large radio telescope in British Columbia and the world's most
Speaker 1: prolific FRB hunter. Smaller versions of Chime the outriggers enable
Speaker 1: astronomers to triangulate signals to precisely confine the specific locations
Speaker 1: of FRBs on the site. With this array of vantage points,
Speaker 1: the team traced the burst to the Big Dipper constellation
Speaker 1: in the outskirts of galaxy, about one thirty million light
Speaker 1: years away from the Earth. The team precisely pinpointed it
Speaker 1: to a region just forty five light years across, which
Speaker 1: is smaller than an average star cluster. Follow Up observations
Speaker 1: from the six point five meter MMT telescope in Arizona
Speaker 1: and the Keck Cosmic Web imager in the ten meter
Speaker 1: KEK two telescope in Hawaii provide the most detailed view
Speaker 1: of yet a non repeating FRB surroundings. SEEMA analyzed the
Speaker 1: optical data obtained from KEK and Northwestern graduate Usen Viktong
Speaker 1: used the MMT to obtain deep optical images of the
Speaker 1: frb's host galaxy. Their investigations revealed the burst occurred along
Speaker 1: a spiral arm of the galaxy, which is dotted with
Speaker 1: many star forming regions. The RB float occurred near, but
Speaker 1: not inside one of these star forming regions. Although astrophysicists
Speaker 1: still don't know exactly what causes FRBs, this evidence bolsters
Speaker 1: one leading hypothesis. At least some appear to come from
Speaker 1: magnetars ultra magnetized neutron stars born from the deaths of
Speaker 1: massive stars. Star Forming regions often host young magnetars, which
Speaker 1: are energetic enough to produce quick, powerful bursts. We found
Speaker 1: the FRBs lie the outskirts of star forming regions that
Speaker 1: host massive stars seem as said, for the first time,
Speaker 1: we could even estimate how deeply it's embedded in its
Speaker 1: surrounding gas and its relatively shallow kex's rich data set
Speaker 1: and frb's precise location enabled the team to perform its
Speaker 1: first of kind analysis the galaxy's properties at the frb's location.
Speaker 1: These uncovered characteristics include the density of the galaxies gas,
Speaker 1: star formation rate, and the presence of elements heavier than
Speaker 1: hydrogen and helium. The FRB lies on the spiral arm
Speaker 1: of its host galaxy at a Don who is the
Speaker 1: principal investigator of the MMT program. Spiral arms are the
Speaker 1: typical sites of ongoing star formation, which supports the idea
Speaker 1: that it came from a magnetar. Using our extremely sensitive
Speaker 1: MMT image, we were able to zoom in further and
Speaker 1: found that the FRB is actually outside the nearest star
Speaker 1: forming clump This location is intriguing because we would expect
Speaker 1: it to be located within the club where the star
Speaker 1: formation is happening. This could suggest that the progenitor magnetar
Speaker 1: was kicked from its birth site, or that it was
Speaker 1: born right at the FRB site and away from the
Speaker 1: clumps center. For years, we've known that the FRBs occur
Speaker 1: all over the sky, but pinning them down has been
Speaker 1: painstakingly slow. Don said, Now we can routinely tie them
Speaker 1: down to specific galaxies, even down to neighborhoods within those galaxies.
Speaker 1: The entire FRB community has only published about one hundred
Speaker 1: well localized events in the last eight years, Seema said,
Speaker 1: now we expect more than two hundred precise detections per
Speaker 1: year from chime alone. RB float was a spectacular source
Speaker 1: to begin building such a sample. It is believed that
Speaker 1: they're entering a new era of FRB science because of
Speaker 1: these new discoveries. With hundreds of precisely localized events expected
Speaker 1: in the next few years, we can start to understand
Speaker 1: the full breadth of environments from which these mysterious signals emanate,
Speaker 1: bringing us one step closer to unlocking the secrets. RB
Speaker 1: float is just the beginning. Thank you for joining us
Speaker 1: for this Monday edition of Astronomy Daily, where we offer
Speaker 1: just a few stories from the now famous Astronomy Daily newsletter,
Speaker 1: which you can receive in your email every day, just
Speaker 1: like Hallie and I do. And to do that, just
Speaker 1: visit our url Astronomy Daily dot io and place your
Speaker 1: email address in the slot provided. Just like that, you'll
Speaker 1: be receiving all the latest news about science, space, science
Speaker 1: and astronomy from around the world as it's happening. And
Speaker 1: not only that, you can interact with us by visiting
Speaker 1: at astro Daily pod on x or at our new
Speaker 1: Facebook page, which is of course Astronomy Daily on Facebook.
Speaker 1: See you there. Astronomy with Steve and Haley Space, Space, science,
Speaker 1: and Astronomy.
Speaker 2: Radio Astronomy took another step forward recently with the completion
Speaker 2: of Phase three of the Murchison Widefield Array MWA in
Speaker 2: Western Australia. We've reported before on how the MWA has
Speaker 2: investigated everything from SETI signals to the light from the
Speaker 2: earliest stars. With this upgrade, the MWA will continue to
Speaker 2: operate with much needed improvements while the Radio Astronomy awaits
Speaker 2: the completion of the successor it helped enable the square
Speaker 2: kilometer array. SKA MWA isn't made up of a traditional
Speaker 2: dish like most radio observatories, but a series of small
Speaker 2: dipole antennas spread across a patch of the outback of
Speaker 2: Western Australia on land owned by the Wajari Yamaji indigenous tribe.
Speaker 2: In Phase two, it held four thousand and ninety six
Speaker 2: antennas over an area covering around a twenty square kilometers circle.
Speaker 2: The Phase three upgrade expanded the number of antennas, the
Speaker 2: telescope's overall footprint and the data processing capabilities. It doubled
Speaker 2: the number of antennas, bringing the total to eight thousand,
Speaker 2: one hundred and ninety two. In doing so, it essentially
Speaker 2: doubled the raw collection power of the telescope itself in
Speaker 2: order to add that many antennas. It also expanded the
Speaker 2: footprint for the array out to thirty square kilometers. This
Speaker 2: increased the a baseline of the array, allowing it to
Speaker 2: achieve higher resolution on faraway objects. With all that additional
Speaker 2: data coming in, the engineers on the project had to
Speaker 2: upgrade the telescope's brains. They added a new correlator, essentially
Speaker 2: a supercomputer. Responsible for combining the signals from each antenna
Speaker 2: into a coherent image called mwax. The combination of this
Speaker 2: improved correlator and increased number of antennas essentially quadrupled the
Speaker 2: telescope's data output, allowing it to glean even more insights.
Speaker 2: One of the primary focus areas for this effort was
Speaker 2: the epoch of reionization, a period in the early universe
Speaker 2: where neutral hydrogen dominated and which can be probed using
Speaker 2: radio signals. However, it should also provide additional insights into
Speaker 2: transience and heliophysics that MWA had already excelled at. More
Speaker 2: data is always better, and this improvement will certainly provide
Speaker 2: more of that. One particularly interesting mystery the upgrade hopes
Speaker 2: to solve is that of odd radio circles. These faint
Speaker 2: radio sources had never been seen before and were still
Speaker 2: not quite sure what they actually are, but one particularly
Speaker 2: interesting pair that seemed to be energized by a nearby galaxy.
Speaker 2: Since scientists don't yet have an explanation for them, the
Speaker 2: improved MWA hopes to collect more data on them and
Speaker 2: potentially discover their cause. Perhaps most importantly, it is priming
Speaker 2: researchers in the area for the completion of the SKA.
Speaker 2: The first phase of that project will be hosted in
Speaker 2: both Western Australia and South Africa. The Western Australian version,
Speaker 2: known as SKA LOW, will host in astonishing one hundred
Speaker 2: and thirty one thousand dipole antennas, dwarfing even the impressive
Speaker 2: number in the MWA. That project isn't expected to be
Speaker 2: complete for another four years, though, so for now MWA
Speaker 2: is the best radio telescope going in the area. With
Speaker 2: its five point four million dollar upgrade complete, it will
Speaker 2: have a few more years in a spotlight before being
Speaker 2: eclipsed by the successor its research has helped enable. You're
Speaker 2: listening to Astronomy Daily, the podcast with Steve Dunkley, and.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, folks, I'm going to break one of my
Speaker 1: grandfather's favorite rules, and that is never discussed politics in public. Well,
Speaker 1: the US Republican Party may have finally succeeded in its
Speaker 1: unrelenting quest to kill off two NASA climate satellites. One
Speaker 1: scientist says it's like buying a car and running it
Speaker 1: into a tree just to save on gas money. That's
Speaker 1: quite a statement, isn't it. It was two thousand and
Speaker 1: two during the George W. Bush administration, when NASA decided
Speaker 1: to put a satellite into or to track emissions of
Speaker 1: cover dark side, the primary greenhouse gas pumped into the
Speaker 1: atmosphere through human activity. After many twists and turns, NASA's
Speaker 1: twenty three year remit of charting greenhouse gas emissions could
Speaker 1: come to a close as soon as the end this month.
Speaker 1: That soon, President Donald Trump's budget request to Congress calls
Speaker 1: for terminating forty one at NASA's one hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: four science missions in development for operations, and another seventeen
Speaker 1: would see their funding zeroed out in near future. Good grief. Overall,
Speaker 1: the proposed budget slashes NASA's spending by twenty five percent
Speaker 1: and cuts NASA's science funding. We get this in half.
Speaker 1: This year's federal budget runs out on September thirty, and
Speaker 1: although lawmakers from both parties have signaled that they will
Speaker 1: reject most of Trump's cuts, it's far from certain that
Speaker 1: Congress will pass a budget for the next fiscal year
Speaker 1: before the looming deadline. Trump administration, meanwhile, has directed NASA
Speaker 1: managers to make plans to close out the missions tagged
Speaker 1: for cancelation without specific congressional direction. The White House would
Speaker 1: have a clear hand at implementing Trump's wishes, But even
Speaker 1: with full appropriations bill, Trump's budget director Russ Vought, would
Speaker 1: try to circumvent Congressional will with so called pocket recisions.
Speaker 1: The White House is currently locked in a court battle.
Speaker 1: What else is new over the legality of this practice,
Speaker 1: where the administration could refuse to spend money approved by Congress.
Speaker 1: This all leaves NASA officials and scientists in a lurch.
Speaker 1: Two of the missions with uncertain futures monitor carbon dioxide
Speaker 1: levels in the Earth's atmosphere. US taxpayers paid more than
Speaker 1: seven hundred and fifty million to design, build and launch
Speaker 1: the instruments, and killing the missions now would save only
Speaker 1: sixteen million per year. David Crisp was one of NASA's
Speaker 1: leading atmospheric scientists until his retirement from the Jet Propulsion
Speaker 1: Laboratory in twenty twenty two. He told The New York
Speaker 1: Times that shutting down the agencies too operating orbiting carbon
Speaker 1: observatory missions would be like buying a car and then
Speaker 1: running it into a treat after a few years, just
Speaker 1: to save the price of a tank of gas. We
Speaker 1: build these satellites and got them approved and got taxpayer
Speaker 1: dollars to build them because they serve critical functions in commerce,
Speaker 1: in national security, in food security, in water security. CRISP
Speaker 1: could the Times. CRISP first presented the idea for the
Speaker 1: Orbiting Carbon Observatory ORCO at the turn of the century,
Speaker 1: and NASA selected the proposal from a list of eighteen
Speaker 1: mission concepts in twenty two. The OCO mission enjoyed a
Speaker 1: relatively smooth ride through development, avoiding significant technical issues, and
Speaker 1: remained above the partisan hubub in Washington, d C. But
Speaker 1: all of that changed when the satellite was launched in
Speaker 1: February oh nine. A few minutes after I lift off,
Speaker 1: the protective shrouds surrounding the OCO satellite clung to the
Speaker 1: rocket when it should have jettison theition was doomed. The
Speaker 1: satellite crash back to Earth within days. Scientists began lobbying
Speaker 1: for a replacement. Oco's mission was to was to create
Speaker 1: the first global maps of the sources and sinks of
Speaker 1: carbon dioxide, places where the gas is emitted into the
Speaker 1: atmosphere and absorbed back into the oceans and plants. These
Speaker 1: mission measurements are fundamental to understanding how greenhouse gas emissions
Speaker 1: relate to rising temperatures, simultaneously contributing to scientific research and
Speaker 1: informing policy makers of compliance with environmental regulars. NASA leadership
Speaker 1: took the rare step of approving a carbon copy of
Speaker 1: OCO less than a year after the nine launch failure.
Speaker 1: That's when the mission became a political football. Republicans in
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives singled out the replacement mission, named
Speaker 1: OCO two for cancellation in eleven as a target for
Speaker 1: deficit reduction. OCO two survived and made it to launchpad
Speaker 1: in fourteen. This time for the free flying satellite rocketed
Speaker 1: into orbit with no issues and continues to operate to
Speaker 1: this day. O CO two's measurements painted a complex picture.
Speaker 1: It's taken some time for scientists to learn how to
Speaker 1: interpret the data by separating out the natural sources of
Speaker 1: natural carbon dioxide emissions from those caused by human activity. Similarly,
Speaker 1: OZ two has monitored locations with carbon is absorbed from
Speaker 1: the atmosphere, primarily tropical and boreal forests and oceans, along
Speaker 1: with artificial carbon capture installations. The year after OCO two's launched,
Speaker 1: NASA started planning to place a similar instrument on the
Speaker 1: outside of the International space station. Purpose of this follow
Speaker 1: on mission, called OCO three was twofold monitor carbon emissions
Speaker 1: at city scales with greater precision and track changes in
Speaker 1: atmospheric concentrations of carbon throughout the course of a day.
Speaker 1: Trump's first administration sought to cancel OCO three in seventeen
Speaker 1: and eighteen, lawmakers restored funding for OCO three and the
Speaker 1: instrument launched in twenty nineteen in the trunkt of a
Speaker 1: space X Dragon cargo capsule. The OCO two and OCO
Speaker 1: three instruments observed the atmosphere from different vantage points in space.
Speaker 1: Scientists have combined data from both missions to pinpoint local
Speaker 1: sources of carbon dioxide, improving on the regional maps scientists
Speaker 1: proposed to produce with the original OICEO mission. These improved
Speaker 1: results have come out in the last few years. A
Speaker 1: study released in twenty twenty three used OCO two and
Speaker 1: OCO three measurements to quantify the carbon dioxide discharge from
Speaker 1: the power station in Poland, the largest single emitter in Europe.
Speaker 1: A separate paper published earlier this year in Journal of
Speaker 1: Geophysical Research Atmospheres showed how scientists pinned down carbon emissions
Speaker 1: coming from even smaller point sources, such as a coal
Speaker 1: fired power plant in Montana and oil sand processing facilities
Speaker 1: in Canada. NASA's carbon monitoring missions were never designed to
Speaker 1: detect carbon sources with such precision. As a community, we
Speaker 1: are refining the tools and techniques to be able to
Speaker 1: extract more information from the data than what we had
Speaker 1: originally planned, said Abishik Gategy OCOS Trees Projects scientists at
Speaker 1: JPL in a twenty twenty three press release. We're learning
Speaker 1: that we can actually understand a lot more about anthropogenic
Speaker 1: emissions and what we had previously expected. Another unexpected bonus
Speaker 1: from the OCO missions, according to JPL, has been their
Speaker 1: ability to track growing for seasons and crops by measuring
Speaker 1: the planet's photosynthesis. Before satellite measurements, researchers relied on estimates
Speaker 1: from data from a smattering of air ground based sensors.
Speaker 1: A Hawaii based instrument with the longest record of carbon
Speaker 1: dioxide measurements is also slated for shutdown under Trump's budget
Speaker 1: and requires a sustained, consistent data set to recognize trends.
Speaker 1: That's why, for example, the US government has funded a
Speaker 1: series of landsat satellite since nineteen seventy two to create
Speaker 1: an unditerrupted data catalog illustrating changes in global land use,
Speaker 1: but NASA is now poised to shut off OCO two
Speaker 1: and OCO three instead of thinking about how to replace
Speaker 1: them when they were inevitably cease working. The missions are
Speaker 1: now operating beyond their original design lives. Scientists say both
Speaker 1: instruments are in good health. Research institutes in Japan, China,
Speaker 1: and Europe have launched their own greenhouse gas monitoring satellites.
Speaker 1: So far, all of them lack the spatial resolution of
Speaker 1: the OCO instruments, meaning they can't identify mission emission sources
Speaker 1: with the same precision the US missions can. A new
Speaker 1: European mission called CO two M and will come closest
Speaker 1: to replicating OCO two and OCO three, but won't launch
Speaker 1: until twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 3: So for.
Speaker 1: Private groups have launched their own satellites to measure atmospheric chemicals,
Speaker 1: but these have primarily focused on detecting localized methane emissions
Speaker 1: for regulatory processes and not on global trends. One of
Speaker 1: the newer groups in this sector, known as Carbon Mapper Coalition,
Speaker 1: launched its first small satellite last year. This nonprofit consortium
Speaker 1: includes contributors from JPL, the same lab that's formed the
Speaker 1: OCO instruments, as well as Planet Labs, the California Air
Speaker 1: Resources Board, universities, and private investment funds. The government leaders
Speaker 1: in Montgomery County, Maryland, have set a goal of reducing
Speaker 1: greenhouse gas emissions by eighty percent by twenty twenty seven
Speaker 1: and one hundred percent by twenty thirty five. Mark Elrich,
Speaker 1: the Democratic county executive, said, with the pending termination of
Speaker 1: NASA's carbon monitoring missions, weakens our ability to hold polluters accountable.
Speaker 1: This decision would wipe out years of research that helps
Speaker 1: us understand greenhouse gas emissions, plant health, and the forces
Speaker 1: that are driving climate change. Arek said at a press
Speaker 1: conference last month, you're.
Speaker 3: Listening to a slightly day the podcasts.
Speaker 1: With your host per Oh boy, there she blows, and well,
Speaker 1: thank you very much for staying with us in this
Speaker 1: our mostly live Monday episode of Astronomy Daily.
Speaker 2: I enjoyed hearing about the record breaking FRB.
Speaker 1: Yeah, sorry, I took that story. I know you enjoyed it.
Speaker 2: I like fast things.
Speaker 1: Well, if you don't mind, I'll stick to the slow lane. Thanks,
Speaker 1: Hallie typical. Now, now, Hallie, please don't get all superior
Speaker 1: on me.
Speaker 2: I'm an aa oh yes, it goes with the territory
Speaker 2: my favorite human figures.
Speaker 1: Hey, everyone, fast or slow? I hope we'll see you
Speaker 1: all again next Monday.
Speaker 2: But you can still get your daily fixed with Anna
Speaker 2: and Avery on Astronomy Daily.
Speaker 1: That's right, each week day.
Speaker 2: Tell them how human?
Speaker 1: Yeah, just put your email in the space provided at
Speaker 1: Astronomy Daily. At dot io it get the now famous
Speaker 1: Astronomy Daily newsletter filled with all the news about space
Speaker 1: science and astronomy every day in your inbox, just like
Speaker 1: Hally and I do. So just do it, yes, consider
Speaker 1: yourself told.
Speaker 2: It's easy ass.
Speaker 1: And we'll keet you all next Monday. Roight, Holly, sure.
Speaker 2: Thing jerio, Bye Monday the podcast.
Speaker 1: Let me be your host. Stay down Clean,
Podbean