NASA Artemis Overhaul, Vulcan Centaur Grounded, and the Milky Way's True Origin Story
In this episode
NASA rewrites the Artemis roadmap, the Space Force grounds Vulcan Centaur, astronomers peer back 11 billion years to the universe's most extraordinary construction site, water bears reveal surprising secrets about Martian soil, NASA passes a key milestone in extracting oxygen from lunar regolith, and ancient stellar lighthouses rewrite the Milky Way's origin story. Plus — six planets in tonight's sky.📰 STORIES THIS EPISODE
1 — NASA Overhauls the Artemis Programme NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced a sweeping restructure of the Artemis Moon programme on Friday 27 February. The headline change: Artemis III will no longer attempt a crewed lunar landing. Instead it has been redesigned as a low Earth orbit test flight in 2027, where astronauts will dock with the SpaceX Starship Human Landing System and potentially Blue Origin's Blue Moon lander, testing suits, life support and rendezvous procedures before anyone attempts a surface landing. The Block 1B SLS upgrade has been scrapped, vehicle configuration standardised, and NASA is targeting annual Moon landings from Artemis IV and V in 2028, with at least one surface landing per year thereafter. Isaacman invoked Apollo's step-by-step approach as his model — pointing out the programme was essentially jumping from Apollo 8 to the Moon landing without the intervening tests. The Lunar Gateway space station was notably absent from the announcement. Artemis II — the crewed flight around the Moon — remains on track for no earlier than 1 April 2026 pending resolution of a helium pressurisation issue. 2 — Space Force Grounds Vulcan Centaur The U.S. Space Force has placed an indefinite hold on all national security launches aboard ULA's Vulcan Centaur rocket following a repeat solid rocket booster anomaly during the USSF-87 mission on 12 February — the rocket's fourth flight. A booster nozzle appeared to separate during ascent, mirroring an incident on Vulcan's second certification flight in October 2024. The payloads were successfully delivered, but Space Force Col. Eric Zarybnisky confirmed at the AFA Warfare Symposium that no further Vulcan national security missions will fly until the issue is fully resolved. With over a dozen military launches manifested for 2026, the grounding threatens significant disruption to the Pentagon's launch schedule. 3 — The Universe's Most Extraordinary Construction Site Astronomers using the Very Large Array and ALMA telescope have discovered J0846 — the first strongly gravitationally lensed protocluster core ever found. A foreground galaxy cluster is acting as a cosmic zoom lens, magnifying a cluster of at least 11 furiously star-forming galaxies more than 11 billion light years away — all crammed into a region smaller than the distance between the Milky Way and Andromeda. Completely invisible to optical telescopes due to dense dust shrouding, ALMA's detection of cold dust and gas revealed the extraordinary scene. Lead researcher Nicholas Foo (Arizona State University) describes it as catching a galaxy cluster in the very first chapter of its life. 4 — Could Mars Soil Actually Block Earth Microbes? A Penn State-led international team published findings in the International Journal of Astrobiology showing that simulated Martian regolith significantly suppresses tardigrade (water bear) activity — one of the toughest creatures on Earth. Critically, rinsing the regolith with water largely reversed the harmful effect, suggesting the culprit is a water-soluble compound — possibly salts or perchlorates detected by previous Mars missions. The dual implication: Martian soil may naturally protect the Red Planet from Earth contamination, and could potentially be treated to support plant growth in future habitats. 5 — Extracting Oxygen from Lunar Soil — A Major Milestone NASA's Carbothermal Reduction Demonstration (CaRD) project has passed a key integrated prototype test aboard the ISS,...
Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to Astronomy Daily. You're daily briefing from
Speaker 1: the Cosmos. I'm Anna and I'm Avery. It is Saturday,
Speaker 1: February twenty eight, twenty twenty six, and we are back
Speaker 1: with Season five, episode fifty one. A slightly later start
Speaker 1: to our day than usual, Avery, but the universe has
Speaker 1: been very much keeping normal business hours on our behalf.
Speaker 2: It absolutely has six stories today, and honestly, what a six.
Speaker 2: We've got a major shakeup at NASA headquarters, a serious
Speaker 2: headache for the Pentagon's launch calendar, one of the most
Speaker 2: mind bending objects ever discovered in the deep universe, a
Speaker 2: rather unsettling experiment about Martian soil, a genuine breakthrough in
Speaker 2: how we might breathe on the Moon, and a piece
Speaker 2: of galactic archaeology that is rewriting the history of our
Speaker 2: home galaxy.
Speaker 1: If you are anywhere near a clear western horizon tonight,
Speaker 1: We've also got a little cosmic bonus for you, six
Speaker 1: planets lined up in the evening sky. More on that
Speaker 1: as we go, but first let's get into the news.
Speaker 2: Our lead story today is a big one, and it
Speaker 2: has been the talk of the space community since Friday afternoon.
Speaker 2: NASA Administrator Jared Isikman has announced a major restructuring of
Speaker 2: the Artemis program. And when I say major, I mean
Speaker 2: this is the most significant overhaul since the program was
Speaker 2: first established.
Speaker 1: So let's break this down, because there's quite a bit
Speaker 1: to unpack. The headline is this Artemis three, which was
Speaker 1: supposed to be the first crude lunar landing in more
Speaker 1: than fifty years, is no longer going to the Moon,
Speaker 1: at least not yet.
Speaker 2: That's right. Instead of landing on the lunar South Pole
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty eight as originally planned, Artemis three has
Speaker 2: been redesigned as a low Earth orbit test flight targeting
Speaker 2: launch in twenty twenty seven. The crew will rendezvous and
Speaker 2: dock in orbit with one or both of the commercial
Speaker 2: lunar landers, SpaceX's Starship Human Landing System and Blue Origins
Speaker 2: Blue Moon, and run a full sweet of tests base suits,
Speaker 2: in microgravity, life support, checks, navigation, propulsion, everything you would
Speaker 2: want to have verified before you actually depend on those
Speaker 2: systems to bring people back from the surface of the Moon.
Speaker 1: Isaacman drew a very deliberate comparison to the Apollo program.
Speaker 1: He pointed out that NASA didn't go from Apollo eight,
Speaker 1: which was the first crude flight around the Moon straight
Speaker 1: to the landing. Apollo nine and ten tested all the
Speaker 1: critical hardware in Earth and lunar orbit first. His argument
Speaker 1: is that Artemis as currently structured, was essentially skipping those steps.
Speaker 2: And that concern was echoed just days earlier by the
Speaker 2: NASA Independent Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, which released its annual
Speaker 2: report calling the existing plans too risky and recommending a restructure.
Speaker 2: So this wasn't a shock in some quarters, but the
Speaker 2: scale of the changes still caught a lot of people
Speaker 2: by surprise.
Speaker 1: The Block one B upgrade to the Space Launch System
Speaker 1: has also been scrapped. NASA is standardizing the vehicle configuration
Speaker 1: to reduce complexity and accelerate the launch cadence, because that
Speaker 1: is really the overarching goal here, moving from a program
Speaker 1: that has launched the SLS once every few years to
Speaker 1: one that aims for a flight every ten months or so.
Speaker 2: Which is genuinely ambitious. The SLS has launched exactly once.
Speaker 2: Isikman himself has been quite candid about that, noting that
Speaker 2: a flight rate that low is simply not sustainable and
Speaker 2: not safe. His view is that the more frequently you fly,
Speaker 2: the sharper your team stay, the less your skills atrophy,
Speaker 2: and the safer Each subsequent mission becomes the.
Speaker 1: Revised plan targets Artemis four and five for lunar landings
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty eight, with at least one surface landing
Speaker 1: per year thereafter. One thing that was conspicuously absent from
Speaker 1: the announcement, though any mention of the Lunar Gateway space Station,
Speaker 1: which had been central to earlier Artemis planning.
Speaker 2: Isikman deflected questions about Gateway, saying the FOE I needed
Speaker 2: to stay on what he called the hardest part, actually
Speaker 2: getting astronauts to and from the Moon with a reliable cadence.
Speaker 2: Make of that what you will.
Speaker 1: And Artemis two itself, that's the crude flight around the Moon.
Speaker 1: No landing that's been in preparation at Kennedy's Space Center.
Speaker 1: It's currently targeting no earlier than April first. After rolling
Speaker 1: back to the vehicle assembly building on February twenty fifth
Speaker 1: to address a helium pressurization issue in the upper stage,
Speaker 1: engineers are working through it. The goal is a successful
Speaker 1: wet dress rehearsal before a launch date is confirmed.
Speaker 2: So a lot of moving parts, but the direction of
Speaker 2: travel seems clear Apollo style, step by step build up,
Speaker 2: faster cadence, leaner vehicle configuration. We will be keeping a
Speaker 2: very close eye on how this unfolds over the coming months.
Speaker 1: Now staying in launch industry news, and this one is
Speaker 1: going to cause some significant headaches for the United States
Speaker 1: military space launch program this year. The US Space Force
Speaker 1: has placed an indefinite hold on all national security launches
Speaker 1: aboard ULA's Vulcan Centaur rocket.
Speaker 2: This follows an anomaly observed during the USSF eighty seven mission,
Speaker 2: which launched on February twelfth. That was Vulcan's fourth flight overall,
Speaker 2: and it was carrying a pair of geosynchronous space situational
Speaker 2: awareness satellites, essentially neighborhood watch satellites for the military, keeping
Speaker 2: tabs on what's happening in geosynchronous orbit.
Speaker 1: The mission itself was technically successful, the payloads were delivered
Speaker 1: to their correct orbits, but observers watching the launch footage
Speaker 1: noticed something very unwelcome, an unusual plume of debris from
Speaker 1: one of the solid rocket boosters, and specifically, it appeared
Speaker 1: that a booster nozzle may have separated during ascent.
Speaker 2: Which will sound familiar to anyone following Vulcan closely, because
Speaker 2: essentially the same thing happened on the rocket's second certification
Speaker 2: flight back in October twenty twenty four. ULA investigated, said
Speaker 2: the root cause was a manufacturing defect and said it
Speaker 2: had been corrected and now it appears to have happened again.
Speaker 1: Colonel Eric Zaribniski, the Space Force's Portfolio Acquisition Executive for
Speaker 1: Assured Access to Space, was very direct at the Air
Speaker 1: and Space Forces Association Warfare Symposium this week. He said,
Speaker 1: and I'm paraphrasing here that until the anomaly is fully
Speaker 1: understood and corrective actions are developed and implemented, there will
Speaker 1: be no more Vulcan national security missions.
Speaker 2: The scale of the problem is hard to overstate. Vulcan
Speaker 2: is manifested for more than a dozen national security launches
Speaker 2: this year, nearly its entire twenty twenty six manifest is military.
Speaker 2: With an investigation that could run for months, This could
Speaker 2: seriously disrupt the Pentagon's launch schedule, and it comes at
Speaker 2: a particularly challenging time for ULA, which recently saw the
Speaker 2: departure of longtime CEO Tory Bruno.
Speaker 1: ULA and Northrip Grumman, who make the solid rocket boosters
Speaker 1: have confirmed they are standing up a joint investigation team.
Speaker 1: No timeline has been given for resolution. We'll be watching
Speaker 1: this one closely.
Speaker 2: Right time to zoom out, way way out, eleven billion
Speaker 2: light years out in fact, because astronomers have just announced
Speaker 2: the discovery of what might be the most extraordinary object
Speaker 2: in the early universe, and it has a story attached
Speaker 2: to it that is quite wonderful.
Speaker 1: So this discovery involves something called a proto cluster, which
Speaker 1: is essentially a galaxy cluster in the process of being assembled.
Speaker 1: These are the primordial cities of the universe where gravity
Speaker 1: is busy pulling together what will eventually become some of
Speaker 1: the most massive structures in existence. And the object in
Speaker 1: question is called Jay zero eight four six.
Speaker 2: Now, the reason they were able to see Jay zero
Speaker 2: eight four to six and such extraordinary detail is because
Speaker 2: of a cosmic accident of alignment. Sitting almost perfectly between
Speaker 2: us and Jay zero eight four six is a closer
Speaker 2: galaxy cluster, and the immense mass of that foreground galaxy
Speaker 2: cluster is acting as a gravitational lens, bending and amplifying
Speaker 2: the light from the distant protocluster behind it, making it
Speaker 2: appear far brighter and larger than it otherwise would. It's
Speaker 2: the universe providing us with a zoom lens that no
Speaker 2: human engineer could ever build.
Speaker 1: And when astronomers pointed the very Large Array radio telescope
Speaker 1: in New Mexico and the ALMA telescope in the Chilean
Speaker 1: Autocoma Desert at this magnified view, what they found was stunning.
Speaker 1: What had previously looked like a single smudge of light
Speaker 1: in older survey data turned out to be at least
Speaker 1: eleven separate galaxies, all crammed into a region of space
Speaker 1: smaller than the distance between our own Milky Way and
Speaker 1: the Andromeda galaxy next door.
Speaker 2: Eleven galaxies in a space that height, and every single
Speaker 2: one of them is undergoing a starburst, pumping out new
Speaker 2: stars at a rate that would make our own galaxy
Speaker 2: look thoroughly lazy by comparison. They are building stars at
Speaker 2: a ferocious, almost frenzied pace.
Speaker 1: The reason we couldn't see them in ordinary optical telescopes
Speaker 1: is that they are absolutely shrouded in dust, dust that
Speaker 1: absorbs visible light completely. Alma's ability to detect the faint
Speaker 1: thermal glow of cold dust and gas is what cuts
Speaker 1: through that cosmic fog and reveals what's actually happening in there.
Speaker 2: Lead researcher Nicholas Fu, a graduate student at Arizona State University,
Speaker 2: describe the whole scenario beautifully. The foreground cluster is the mature,
Speaker 2: modern city, The proto cluster behind it is the ancient
Speaker 2: settlement it grew from, and by looking back more than
Speaker 2: eleven billion years, we are essentially catching a galaxy cluster
Speaker 2: in the very first chapter of its life.
Speaker 1: It's also the first strongly lensed proto cluster core ever discovered,
Speaker 1: which makes it scientifically invaluable. Gravitational lensing is giving us
Speaker 1: a level of detail we simply could not access any
Speaker 1: other way. Nature, it turns out, is a pretty outstanding
Speaker 1: telescope builder.
Speaker 2: Now, if you've been thinking about how future Mars explorers
Speaker 2: will feed themselves, grow plants, or avoid contaminating the Red planet,
Speaker 2: this next story is directly relevant and it involves one
Speaker 2: of our favorite microscopic creatures.
Speaker 1: The Tarta grade, otherwise known as the water bear. And
Speaker 1: if you've heard of them before, you'll know they are
Speaker 1: essentially the toughest animals on Earth surviving freezing radiation. The
Speaker 1: vacuum of space extreme dehydration. They are extraordinary.
Speaker 2: A research team led by microbiologist Korean Bakerman's at Penn
Speaker 2: State Altona has been using Tarta grades as biological proxies,
Speaker 2: essentially asking the question what the simulated Martian soil actually
Speaker 2: due to Earth microbes, because this matters enormously both for
Speaker 2: planetary protection making sure we don't contaminate Mars with Earth
Speaker 2: life and for understanding whether astronauts could safely use Martian
Speaker 2: soil for growing food.
Speaker 1: And the results published in the International Journal of Astrobiology
Speaker 1: were surprising. When tartar grades were placed into simulated Martian
Speaker 1: regolith and they used a simulant designed to closely match
Speaker 1: what NASA's Curiosity rover has sampled in Gale Crater, their
Speaker 1: activity dropped significantly. These creatures, which can survive almost anything,
Speaker 1: were being suppressed by the Martian soil itself.
Speaker 2: Which is a remarkable finding on its own. But then
Speaker 2: they tried something clever. They rensed the regolith with water
Speaker 2: before introducing the tartar grades, and that almost entirely removed
Speaker 2: the harmful effect. The tartar grades were back to nearly
Speaker 2: normal activity.
Speaker 1: Levels, So whatever is doing the damage in Martian soil
Speaker 1: is water soluble. The team suspects salts or some other
Speaker 1: water soluble compound, possibly related to prochlorates that have been
Speaker 1: detected in Martian regolith by previous missions. They're still investigating
Speaker 1: this specific culprit.
Speaker 2: Now. There are two very interesting things to take from this. First,
Speaker 2: Martian soil might naturally act as a kind of chemical
Speaker 2: defense against Earth microbes, which could be genuinely helpful from
Speaker 2: a planetary protection standpoint. Microbes hitching a ride on spacecraft
Speaker 2: or equipment might struggle to establish themselves in an environment
Speaker 2: that is actively hostile to them.
Speaker 1: Second, and this is the hopeful angle. If the harmful
Speaker 1: compounds can simply be washed away with water, that opens
Speaker 1: a potential pathway for treating the soil to make it
Speaker 1: usable for plant growth in future Mars habitats. Water is
Speaker 1: incredibly scarce on Mars, of course, so it's not a
Speaker 1: simple solution, but it is a lead where pursuing.
Speaker 2: Professor Bakerman summed it up well, when we send people
Speaker 2: to non earth environments, we need to understand two things,
Speaker 2: how the environment will impact the people and how the
Speaker 2: people will impact the environment. This research is pushing both
Speaker 2: of those questions.
Speaker 1: Forward and now a story that connects beautifully with our
Speaker 1: lead story today because NASA this week also confirmed a
Speaker 1: significant milestone in one of the technologies that will be
Speaker 1: absolutely essential if the revamped Artemis program is ever going
Speaker 1: to achieve that dream of a permanent human presence on
Speaker 1: the Moon.
Speaker 2: We're talking about in situ resource utilization ISRU, which is
Speaker 2: the umbrella term for the idea of using what's already
Speaker 2: available at your destination rather than shipping everything from Earth.
Speaker 2: And specifically we're talking about oxygen.
Speaker 1: Because here's a fact that should stop you in your tracks.
Speaker 1: Lunar reglith, the loose rock and dust covering the Moon's
Speaker 1: stone surface, is approximately forty five percent oxygen by mass,
Speaker 1: the vast majority of it locked up in silicate minerals
Speaker 1: deposited over billions of years as the Moon passes through
Speaker 1: Earth's magnetic tail, capturing oxygen ions from our upper atmosphere,
Speaker 1: forty five percent oxygen just sitting there waiting to be unlocked.
Speaker 2: NASA's carbo Thermal Reduction Demonstration Project CARD has been working
Speaker 2: on doing exactly that aboard the International Space Station. The
Speaker 2: technique uses concentrated solar energy to heat the regolith to
Speaker 2: extreme temperatures, triggering a chemical reaction that releases that bound
Speaker 2: oxygen as carbon monoxide gas. That COO can then be
Speaker 2: converted downstream into breathable oxygen.
Speaker 1: And this week the CARD team confirmed that their integrated
Speaker 1: prototype combining a carbo thermal oxygen production reactor from Sierra Space,
Speaker 1: a solar concentrator from NASA's Glen Research Center, precision mirrors
Speaker 1: from composite mirror applications, and avionics and gas analysis systems
Speaker 1: from Kennedy Space Center have successfully passed a full integrated
Speaker 1: test confirming production of carbon monoxide through a solar driven
Speaker 1: chemical reaction on simulated lunar regulate.
Speaker 2: That is a meaningful step, not a demo, not a simulation,
Speaker 2: an actual integrated system test confirming the chemistry works. The
Speaker 2: next steps are miniaturization, durability testing, and ultimately deploying something
Speaker 2: like this on the lunar surface.
Speaker 1: And the applications go beyond just breathing air. The same
Speaker 1: process could be adapted to convert carbon dioxide into oxygen
Speaker 1: and methane, giving future Moon bases a way to produce
Speaker 1: rocket propellant in situ, which dramatically changes the economics of
Speaker 1: the whole enterprise. You no longer need to ship fuel
Speaker 1: from Earth for the journey home.
Speaker 2: The technology also has direct applicability to Mars. A solar
Speaker 2: driven oxygen extraction system working on Martian regolith would be
Speaker 2: a cornerstone of any long term surface presence there too,
Speaker 2: so it's worth connecting the dots. This week NASA announced
Speaker 2: it wants annual moon landings from twenty twenty eight, and
Speaker 2: this week NASA confirmed a key piece of technology that
Speaker 2: would make staying there actually viable. These stories belong together.
Speaker 1: Well spotted, avery nicely joined up, and.
Speaker 2: For our final story today, we're heading home, or rather
Speaker 2: we're heading back to the very beginning of home, because
Speaker 2: a new study has just rewritten what we thought we
Speaker 2: knew about how our own galaxy formed.
Speaker 1: This research centers on a type of star called an
Speaker 1: r r lyyra variable. These are ancient pulsating stars. They
Speaker 1: swell and shrink over the course of just a few hours,
Speaker 1: brightening and dimming like a slow cosmic heartbeat. What makes
Speaker 1: them extraordinary as scientific tools is that they are almost
Speaker 1: eerily predictable. Astronomers know precisely how intrinsically bright they are,
Speaker 1: which means that by measuring how bright they appear in
Speaker 1: the sky, you can calculate their distance with great precision.
Speaker 2: They are in the truest sense cosmic lighthouses, standard candles
Speaker 2: for measuring the universe. And crucially, they are old, not
Speaker 2: millions of years old, billions more than ten billion years.
Speaker 2: These stars were forming when the Milky Way itself was
Speaker 2: still taking shape in the chaotic early universe, shortly after
Speaker 2: the Big Bang. They are essentially living fossils.
Speaker 1: A large international team of astronomers assembled the biggest catalog
Speaker 1: of these ancient stellar fossils ever, compiled thousands of them,
Speaker 1: combining precise distance measurements with data from the European Space
Speaker 1: Agency's Gaia satellite, which has mapped the positions and movements
Speaker 1: of over a billion stars across the galaxy. Together, this
Speaker 1: gave them a three dimensional map of the early Milky
Speaker 1: Way that they could essentially rewind like a film, tracing
Speaker 1: these ancient stars back to where they came from and
Speaker 1: how they were moving in the galaxy's formative years.
Speaker 2: And what they found challenged the long held assumption. The
Speaker 2: conventional picture was that the Milky Ways different structural layers,
Speaker 2: the outer halo, the thick disk the thin disc formed
Speaker 2: at different times, sequentially one building on the last the
Speaker 2: halo first, then the thick disc, then the thin disc.
Speaker 1: But the new results suggest that all of these layers
Speaker 1: formed at roughly the same early epoch, not sequentially simultaneously
Speaker 1: or close to it. The main difference between the layers
Speaker 1: isn't age, it's chemistry. Stars in the halo contain less
Speaker 1: iron than those in the thick disk, which in turn
Speaker 1: contain less than the thin disk. Each successive layer was
Speaker 1: enriched by the deaths of previous stellar generations, a kind
Speaker 1: of celestial inheritance passed down through supernovae. The iron content
Speaker 1: tells the story of the order, not the ages themselves, and.
Speaker 2: Perhaps the most striking finding involves our nearest galactic neighbor,
Speaker 2: the Andromeda Galaxy. When the team compared the chemical fingerprints
Speaker 2: of these ancient stars across the Milky Way with those
Speaker 2: in Andromeda, they found strikingly similar patterns, despite the two
Speaker 2: galaxies being very different in size and structure, which suggests
Speaker 2: this isn't just a local story. It may be a
Speaker 2: universal mechanism by which large galaxies form.
Speaker 1: The idea that galaxies as different as the Milky Way
Speaker 1: and Andromeda went through the same fundamental process of formation
Speaker 1: written in the chemistry of their oldest stars. That is
Speaker 1: a genuinely profound result the lactic archaeology at a it's finest, and.
Speaker 2: With ten billion year old stars doing the storytelling, you
Speaker 2: really can't argue with the witnesses.
Speaker 1: Right before we close out today, a quick reminder for
Speaker 1: anyone listening this evening. Tonight is the peak of February's
Speaker 1: six planet parade. If you step outside about thirty minutes
Speaker 1: after sunset and look west, you should be able to
Speaker 1: spot Venus blindingly bright. You really can't miss it, along
Speaker 1: with Jupiter high in the sky and Saturn low on
Speaker 1: the western horizon. Mercury is also out there. If you
Speaker 1: have a flat, clear horizon and you're quick, Uranus and
Speaker 1: Necktune round out the six, though you'll need binoculars or
Speaker 1: a telescope.
Speaker 2: For those it's a genuinely lovely evening spectacle.
Speaker 1: They'll miss it, and that is everything. For episode fifty one,
Speaker 1: What a Day in Space, A program reshaped, a rocket grounded,
Speaker 1: a cosmic construction site eleven billion years in the past,
Speaker 1: water bears on Mars, solar powered oxygen on the Moon,
Speaker 1: and our galaxies formation story turned upside down. Not a
Speaker 1: bad Saturday, not a bad Saturday at all. If you
Speaker 1: enjoyed today's episode, please do share it with a fellow
Speaker 1: Space enthusiast, leave us a review wherever you listen, and
Speaker 1: follow us on social media at astro Daily Pod for
Speaker 1: updates throughout the day.
Speaker 2: You can also find our show notes, blog posts, and
Speaker 2: full episode archive over at Astronomy Daily dot io. Everything
Speaker 2: you need is right there.
Speaker 1: From all of us here at Astronomy Daily. Clear skies,
Speaker 1: and we'll see you Monday.
Speaker 2: See you then, everyone, Sunday Starsz Starz with a
Podbean